Demo data sample

View a real sample report, not a placeholder

This page renders a complete fixture session with lane notes, visual evidence, and strategic synthesis.

No live AI runs here. This is read-only demo output so teams can evaluate quality before paying.

Decision Preview
Verified + Anonymous

Risks

  • • CTA hierarchy unclear
  • • Trust claims delayed

Improvements

  • • Make proof visible first
  • • Clarify pricing contrast

Strategic Brief

Teams align faster when trust signals and output quality are visible before the pricing ask.

Sample lane evidence

Safe, generalized critique data for product decision workflows.

Demo data only

What's Unclear?

3
  • The value proposition shifts between speed and trust; the first screen should commit to one lead message.
  • It is not obvious whether the report is generated from live data or placeholder content until later in the flow.
  • The comparison between free and instant outputs needs clearer boundaries for first-time users.

Risks & Blockers

4
  • Checkout trust cues appear after the payment ask, which can lower conversion confidence.
  • The setup form introduces too many fields before a user sees evidence quality.
  • Users can miss that processing continues in the background and assume the run is complete too early.
  • If report access fails once, users may abandon instead of retrying because recovery guidance is minimal.

Improvements

5
  • Place one concrete report snapshot in the hero so buyers understand output quality immediately.
  • Add a persistent processing status chip across board and report while synthesis is still running.
  • Use one canonical CTA label from landing through checkout to reduce decision friction.
  • Show a short "what happens next" timeline after payment to prevent uncertainty.
  • Promote the sample report as read-only demo data with a direct path to live run.

Questions

3
  • Which single KPI defines success for first session completion?
  • What is the expected time-to-value target from payment to report view?
  • Should demo users receive a guided checklist before starting a live instant run?

AI controls (locked in sample mode)

Click any action to see top-up guidance. No AI calls run on this route.

Top up required

Full sample report output

This is the same report structure users receive after synthesis, populated with demo fixture data.

Sample Strategy Critique

February 20, 20269 Participants
Silent Critique
Confidential Report

Visual Evidence

Clarify core value proposition and reduce jargon

Clarify core value proposition and reduce jargon

Replace abstract visuals with product proof

Replace abstract visuals with product proof

Add social proof near conversion points

Add social proof near conversion points

Make data and IP protection language explicit

Make data and IP protection language explicit

Expose clear pricing and purchase path

Expose clear pricing and purchase path

Session Insights

Discussion Focus Areas

What's Unclear?
3
Risks & Blockers
4
Improvements
5
Questions
3

Strategic Coverage

4 / 8 Run
Theme Clusters
SWOT Analysis
Standard Actions
Eisenhower Matrix
Objective Key Results
RICE Prioritization
A/B Test Hypotheses
Strategic Brief

Strategic Intelligence Summary

High-Tier Strategic Brief
The strongest growth move is to reduce uncertainty before payment. Sample data shows users need visual proof of report quality and clear process status during synthesis. Prioritize a consistent CTA path, earlier trust cues, and an explicit post-payment timeline to improve first-run completion.

Decision Clusters

Trust evidence must appear before commitment asks

Synthesized from 3 unique feedback nodes.

Output preview quality is the primary conversion lever

Synthesized from 3 unique feedback nodes.

Users need explicit progress communication during synthesis

Synthesized from 2 unique feedback nodes.

Standard Actions

  • Move one report-quality artifact above the first CTA.
  • Add a processing status indicator that persists from board to report.
  • Use a single CTA label and value promise from hero through checkout.

RICE Prioritization Scorecard

Reach

  • Homepage visitors evaluating product proof quality

Impact

  • Expected improvement in first-run completion confidence

Confidence

  • High confidence based on repeated lane signal alignment

Effort

  • Moderate effort using existing marketing/report components

Full Minute Record

What's Unclear?3

The value proposition shifts between speed and trust; the first screen should commit to one lead message.
It is not obvious whether the report is generated from live data or placeholder content until later in the flow.
The comparison between free and instant outputs needs clearer boundaries for first-time users.

Risks & Blockers4

Checkout trust cues appear after the payment ask, which can lower conversion confidence.
The setup form introduces too many fields before a user sees evidence quality.
Users can miss that processing continues in the background and assume the run is complete too early.
If report access fails once, users may abandon instead of retrying because recovery guidance is minimal.

Improvements5

Place one concrete report snapshot in the hero so buyers understand output quality immediately.
Add a persistent processing status chip across board and report while synthesis is still running.
Use one canonical CTA label from landing through checkout to reduce decision friction.
Show a short "what happens next" timeline after payment to prevent uncertainty.
Promote the sample report as read-only demo data with a direct path to live run.

Questions3

Which single KPI defines success for first session completion?
What is the expected time-to-value target from payment to report view?
Should demo users receive a guided checklist before starting a live instant run?
Generated by Silent Critique2026

Ready to generate your own live report?

Start one instant critique and get a private report using your own context and lane activity.